Essay --

As I began my research for this essay, it became clearly obvious that there is no consensus on the roots of nations. From Gellner to Smith, a million little points in conviction and space screw be credited for the creation of a nation, which in itself carries various meanings and connotations. Believing that both modernists, who interpret nationalism as existence associated with industrial economy and centralized authority, and primordialists, who argue nations are ancient and inseparable phenomena, make valid points, I wee-wee opted to adhere to Michael Manns translation that the structure of nations had multiple causes and stages cascading on top of each other in unexpected and unfortunate vogues. They were contingent because dissimilar causal chains, each of which we can trace and explain quite well, came together in a way that we cannot explain in terms of either of them, yet which proved by the bye for the outcome (Mann 2012 3). Nevertheless, despite the range of expla nations for nationalism, one concept is reoccurring. Humans, either in their local, state or transnational societies, are driven by power, and those who have the ability to force their decisions upon others yield power. Regardless of the fact that colonialism and imperialism are no longer recognized as current practices, international society politic exists under the umbrella of neo-colonial influences, of which globalization is a product of. In this essay, I will explore the status of the nation and nationalism as it shortly exists under neo-colonial influences. For long-term survival, human cultures, and therefore nations, have had to adapt to different environments and shifting conditions. Todays technological growth has challenged nations to adjust at an ever-faster pace, unse... ...each into the international community. This is evident in the types of nationalism Ive explored, both in the altogether nationalism and cosmopolitanism. They are opposing views of what nationalis m is or can start in the future, but both have qualities that allow smaller nations to have-to doe with their existence in the international society. I have inadvertently denotative my opinion that nations are structurally political and that it is in the interest of their leading to appeal to their unique traditions in order to maintain their power. Either way, the picking between these two approaches rests on the hands of the nation and its relationship with the international society. Globalization does not hinder the existence of the nation but kinda helps it establish a place in the structure of power in a world which is still dominated by politically and economically dominant super powers.