Privacy vs. National Security Essay

The scope and nature of the occupation is that after September 11, 2001 the governing body has deepen its surveillance procedure to a terrorisation level. With integrity insurance, The USA nationalist make a motion-2001, the US regimen has effectively turned the joined States of America into a police state. This insurance arrests the administration run agencies the veracious to rat on its citizens. Agents can gather schooling by physic altogethery watching, or by other covert means much(prenominal) as wire taps. It is no long-lived a specific phone cablegram just now on man-to-mans. It allows service providers to recrudesce information and values them from court achievemention when the do. It permits a delay in phiz notification, vainglorious agents the ability to seem before they support a absolve in hand. This policy gives the regimen the responsibility to acc white plague, intimi come across, and imprison its citizens of terrorism, and displace the Bill of rightfields. The Bill of Rights was created to protect the stack from various injustices that the administration could commit.The amendments that ar affected the most are the 1st, 4th, and the 6th. (Asian Tribune,Hallstavik,June 5,2012, US nationalist set has denied Americans their freedom) Amendment I Congress shall forge no virtue respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise in that locationof or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the salutary of raft peaceably to assemble, and petition the governing body for a redress of grievances.(Hamilton, A.,1775, The Bill of Rights) The patriot subprogram gives the government the freedom to superintend religious and political institutions without just take a shit. The government as well now has the authority to follow any type of record keeper if they die that the government has subpoenaed information from them for a terrorismInvestigation. (Asian Tribune, Hallstavik, Ju ne 5, 2012, US nationalist go has denied Americans their freedom) Amendment IV The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon presumable cause. Supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. (Hamilton, A., 1775, Bill of Rights) The nationalist proceeding of course now gives the US government to do just that. They may search and seize a citizens seat without probable cause regardless of it pertinency to a terror investigation. (Asian Tribune Hallstavik, June 5, 2012, US Patriot Act has denied Americans their freedom) Amendment VI In all criminal prosecutions, the criminate shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and territorial dominion wherein the crime shall draw been committed, which district shall view as been previously find outed by law, and to be informed at the nature and cause of the accusation to be confronted with the witnesses against him to have needed process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistant of counsel for his defense. (Hamilton, A., 1775, Bill of Rights)The Patriot Act has given the government the power to tuck away US citizens indefinitely without charge or trial, or even to confront the witnesses against them. at a time labeled an unlawful combatant, the accused can and have been held without communication and denied their right to an attorney. When they are permitted the attorneys and housed in a federal prison, they lose the right to attorney/ lymph node privilege. The government now has the right to observe those communications as well. (Asian Tribune Hallstavik, June 5, 2012, US Patriot Act has denied Americans their freedom)Though there is one good point to the policy, which is providing for victims of terrorism, public officers and their families. That is but a single clause in the policy that is for the people, the rest gives the government an sweep over and undeniable control over the American citizens rights and the means to continue and expand its control. In the summary, The USA Patriot Act A Sketch, by Charles Doyle, which can be locate at http//www.fas.org/irp/crs/RS21203.pdf ,a reader can distinctly see that what the Bill of Rights gave us the Patriot Act takes away. Reading numerous articles and summaries of the solve it is obvious that the American people should be concerned about just how much power the government is gaining, then bragging(a) to the military and agencies such as the national Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and Central playscript of honor Agency (CIA).The power the agencies have, have been a problem in the past as well. In 1975 the senate had selected a committee to negociate these agencies, primarily the FBI, which had been declared a vigilance man organization. Focusi ng on suppressing conventions from exercising their origin Amendment rights, the FBI went with the theory that preventing the growth of a group would protect national certification. The Patriot Act has basically nullified this committee, while granting the government agencies free reign. (Hentoff,N., December 17, 2001, Homeland defense team of the Constitution)Since the bombing in Oklahoma city on April 15, 1995, the government has attempted to do more to prevent another terrorist round, and it began with the Antiterrorism and impressive Death Penalty Act of 1996. This in simplest terms takes the right of Habeus away from those convicted of terrorism. To file away for Habeas Corpus is to petition for an early chemise and can be done repeatedly. The attack on the Twin Towers on 9-11 unluckily has shaken the countries defense structure to its very core allowing for some rather irrational and extreme actions to be taken. such(prenominal) as the US Patriot Act, this act was ad opted as a sunset policy (meaning it would expire in quaternary years). This was to enable the unmarried agencies to adapt and ascertain the effectiveness (Fritscher, L., November. 5, 2007.USA Patriot Act Pros and Cons).This policy, which to intercourse an unprecedented 43 days to sign on into law, was essentially formed to treamline communications betwixt the agencies to provide easier means of investigation and surveillance. otherwise policies that are not so astray impacted have been passed as well. Policies such as, the National justification Authorization Act, preparation these agencies the funding to continue. Preliminary research indicates a growing concern the government, and the agencies there of, are gaining too much power, and the aggressive use of this power is progressively eroding the individual American citizens privacy and civil liberties. How do the people know that the information self-possessed by various agencies is not being abused? What assurances can the government give that they wont be? The security of a nation is a study concern to all Americans, but should there be a limit to what the government can do in the quote of National protective cover.Problems with abuse of privilege have been an issue in the past as well. During the cold war the foreign recognition Act was introduced and passed requiring agents to obtain a warrant from a judge before they could pester private conversations. To gain a warrant government lawyers had to have proof that an individual was a threat. In 2008 this act was revise enabling the procedures to be overlooked. In point, the law was bypassed by the Bush administration in 2001 after the terrorist attack on 9-11. Individuals and organizations likewise are attempting to sue the government in regards to the ongoing surveillance program. The ACLU (American civilian Liberties Union), give tongue to that the, people cannot sue unless they can disposition their calls were monitored.) Alas, the government will not reveal whose messages were intercepted, therefore no proof (Scalliger,C. whitethorn 21, 2012). Obviously, the odds are greatly against those who correct the current policies.Individuals have come front to attempt to inform the public of the actions of the government but to no avail. In 2007 an ex NSA employee reported that a program, codenamed Stellar get up was already underway. Gathering information on millions of American citizens, the NSA gained access to more than 2.8 jillion billing records of domestic and international calls. All, without a warrant. At a later date Verizon joined the program multiplying the call treasure five times over. Not simply is the NSA and other agencies compiling dossiers on US citizens in these massive data bases, they also currently have the ability to listen in real-time. US citizens overseas are routinely intercepted when calling home to the states. No reason or warrant requisite (Hentoff, N., October 6, 2011).The reali ty is that unwarranted wiretaps are tho the beginning. Other forms of spying on the reasonable citizen are already being used. The quartern Amendment was written to protect our rights to privacy, yet our avow government officials a sidestepping these laws. Though the word privacy never actually appears in the Constitution, it would be difficult to say the fact that something of the meaning of the word has long been schematic in legal traditions. The American heritage Dictionary defines the word private as secluded from sight, presence or impact of others, to be confined to one person personal (Mitrano, T., May 2012).A primary(a) responsibility of the United States government is to protect the citizens and its resources against the threat of terrorism, and Americans appreciate the security they have, and at times have sacrificed liberties to protect it (Walker, B. and Rsachke, G., nd). But, in spite of the measures taken to protect its people the government is also harming the ir basic of import rights that this country has always been known for. So are the citizens of the United States to give up democracy for a governmental totalitarianism for the sake of this safety. Whats in monetary fund for the next generation?ReferencesAsian Tribune Hallstavik, (June 5, 2012), US Patriot Act has denied Americans their freedom, Retrieved from, http//search.proquest.com/docview/1018399742? Doyle, C., (April 19, 2008), Patriot Act A Sketch,Retrieved from, http//www.fas.org/irp/crs/RS21203.pdf. Hamilton, A., (1775), Bill of Rights.Retrieved from, http//www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights_transcripts.htm Hentoff, N., (December 17, 2001), Homeland Defense of the Constitution, The Washington Times, Retrieved from, http//scu.edu/ethics/publication/briefings/privacy.html Hentoff, N., (October 6, 2011), neglect of Privacy, becoming normal? The Fort Morgan Times,Retrieved from, http//search.proquest.com/docview/919661310? Mitrano, T., (December 2008), Civil Privacy and National Security rule A Three- Dimensional View, Retrieved from http//www.educause.edu/ero/article/civil-privacy-and- national-security-legislation-three.htmScalliger, C. (May 21, 2012), subtle every bit about you. The pertly American issue 28, p. 10-16, Retrieved from, http//search.proquest.com/docview/1022039930?Walker, B. & Raschke, G., (nd) Right to Privacy vs. National Security, National Security for the 21st Century, Retrieved from, http//www.library.gatech.edu/security/privacy.htm