Individualized Education Program Essay

tout ensemble bookmans make water a right to raising and safety at the put down of the coach that he/she attends, including assimilators with extra urgency that requires superfluous situation with no additional cost. Having such a diverse bookman body, an administrator would need to defend an understanding of the legal ramification that is included in disciplining and cooperative special education schoolingchilds academic each toldy.All disciples have a right to be educated and in education there is a needed to generate cautious that a special educational schoolchild can be expelled and/or sus inditeded for world offenders of the school disciplinary code of conduct, handle all former(a) students. Also, stave and administration must(prenominal) become conscious of the procedures of the IDEA in punish students of special necessitate. This paper will demonstrate the disciplining of a special education students and if the disciplinary action taken to discipline a students was appropriated according to the special education laws. educatee of special needs has multiple office encounters that surface into referrals due to unacceptable demeanor in the instructional classrooms environment as well as new(prenominal) stadium of the school. For example, the students of special needs were standing out outside of a classroom. The students and other student was engaged in an argument begin to push and lug each other. The mavin student agreed but the other special needs student through a punch at the other student. A teacher grab the student, however the special needed student continue the confrontation and teacher lead him away.Further, at the beginning of the category the special needs student was transport to the school due to behavior at local school. The student is a high school student and test data is show that the student is behind three grades trains. The student refuses to completed work and continues to interrupt the breeding enviro nments. Added, the students show high level of frustration toward the instructor when periodically. The student attends class casual without pencil/pen or paper. Student has shown aggressiveness of verbal and physiologic threats toward other students in the classroom as well as disrespect toward staff.The students has been tested and place as having an Emotional Behavior Disorder (EBD). The student show infinitesimal progress in developing relationships with the dean of students, social worker, and other staff members such as the ESE staff at the school. The student have several alarming emotional concerns that differ from one incident to the next, and on different levels of how serious of the students disability is, therefore, interrupting the whole educational process. Moreover, the student is showing behaviors of withdrawals and isolation.Students with this disability experience a lot of tribulations when it comes to maintaining any relationships involving their peers or adult s. It is realistic that many of them will have a medical diagnosis. This particular student is very disruptive in class on a daily basis and has a hard time focusing and capturing the content being instructed. The student p arnt feels challenged and pushed beyond measure in hideing the students behaviors toward the classroom environments and his education.She empathizes for the child because his bewilder past when he was younger and she have not remarried. She believes that the students are not just having few bad days, on with having a hard time adjusting to the change of not having a father nor sibling to express thought too. The teacher perspective of the situations was as follows the student needs to build skills in areas of respecting other space and cooperation. She believes that overall the special needs student is a great students when desire to be.Added, after learning the student background the teacher believed that student needs counseling to address the students deep er emotions, which are preventing the student from becoming successful in the classroom. The student attention exploreing has become a great bewilderment as well as the students action has presented a safety hazard for other students and staff. The administration staff decided to reassign the student (without notifying the parent) to an alternative program.When investigating the incidents in the hallway, the finding showed that that the student is at- stake to himself as well as fellow students and staff members. The suggested program presents an fortune of preventing him from dropping out of school, providing the student with another option of educational. This reassignment will religious service as a disciplinary consequence, which provides the student time to address behavioral remediation. Although, the students feels that this is not the place he want to go.He refuses to agree to the reassignment. Student further express that he will not be handout to the school for reme diation. Although the school acts in the best interest of the majority the school was out of compliance because according to the Federal governments No Child Left Behind legislation (NCLB), the school has violated the student right to choose. The No child Left behind Legislation insists that a student is entitled to choose the reassignment school. Further, all parents/guardians must be communicate of the change.Additionally, as part of the compliance with the NCLB legislation, any student who is a dupe of a violent crime will be offered an opportunity to seek a school choice transfer rather than an alternative program. Because the school did not contact the parents to inform her of these interventions that the Student Support Team suggested. They did not provide the parent the right to be informed of all the data and how they are protected under three significant federal statutes the IDEA, the American with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Sectio n 504 (Essex, 2012).Moreover, the ADA protects individuals whom have one or more physical or mental deficiencies, have a record of such impairments and are regarded as currently having that impairment. The individual must also qualify for the position, or program that is in question in order to be protected under the ADA. The Section 504s criteria for aegis are identical to those stated under the ADA. All of these laws are great deal in place to act and use as a guidepost for any student with special education needs. If this issue was to be brought in front of a judge, most likely the ruling would be in favor of the parent and student.HONIG, California Superintendent of Public Instruction v. DOE, et al. (1988). unafraid determination in school discipline case on behalf of emotionally disturbed children who had academic and social problems. Court clarified procedural issues knowing to protect children from school officials, parent role, and stay put, that schools shall not expe l children for behaviors relate to their handicaps. Doug C. v. Hawaii (9th Cir. 2013) On June 13, 2013, the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued an important decision about enate participation at IEP meetings.Pete says that All special education staff who conducts IEP meetings should be familiar with this landmark ruling about IEP meetings and parental participation. Another area the school fails to address staff touching students or allowing another student to touch another student could motivate a law suit. In the case Pitasky, 1995, a law suit was change against school personal. In this case if a student inquired injuries, either physical or emotional, that occurs either accidentally or intentionally, from the fight.The school could be accounted for illegitimate actions and to deter such actions in the future (Fisher, Schimmel, & Kelly, 1995). In closing, all students have a right to education and safety at the write off of the school that he/she attends, including students with special need that requires special situation with no additional cost. It is important to maintain collaborative support system amongst the school, family, and community to ensure a positive outcome to maintain a productive and effective educational environment.In the educational arena are many of special need students in educational programs whom are industrious and will be able to function as productive citizens, with the kosher services and procedures that are available. Courts have acknowledged that schools cannot guarantee the safety of all students (Mawdsley, 1993). Schools officials and school personnel, however, may have legal liability when a student is injured either by a deliberate action or negligence by a teacher. References Doug C. v. Hawaii (9th Cir.2013). Retrieved fromttp//www. wrightslaw. com/caselaw. htm Essex, N. (2012). Religion and the Public Schools. In Fossel, M. & Holstein, N. (Eds. ), School Law and the Public Schools A Practical leave for Educational Leaders (5th ed. ) HONIG, California Superintendent of Public Instruction v. DOE, et al. (1988). Retrieved from http//www. wrightslaw. com/caselaw. htm Mawdsley RD. supervisory standard of care for students with disabilities. Wests Educ Law Q. 1993 2421433. Quoted in Yell M (2001).