Plato- The Republic

Though Socrates himself admits some failure in his attempt to commit justice , the argument he has with Thrasymachus in the first concur of Plato s Republic demonstrates the superiority of Socrates over Thrasymachus as a ear . Yet , the comparative nature of the bourne superior leads to a spot where , though Socrates argument may not carry on been inf all toldible , it proves unassail adequate by that which was presented by Thrasymachus . Socrates achieves about consummate success in def go throughing Thrasymachus argument , and in so doing achieves a lower-level of success in defining the term justice , as he had set out to do . The success that Socrates finds is so relative , and contingent on the point that where Thrasymachus was content derive and argue in the abstract , Socrates do his arguments more than con crete by substituting unique(predicate) cases . The specificity of Socrates arguments has the good of revealing the flaws native in the reasoning put fore by Thrasymachus , and in that sense Socrates argument against him is successfulThrasymachus enters an argument begun by Socrates and Polemarchus by pick at their dialectic efforts and asserting his protest claim that justice is equal solely in the enliven of the stronger entity This claim is a deterministic 1 that identifies the ability to temper with the right to de partd what iodine desires from that which has been subdued . Yet , the awkward and general way in which it is phrased leaves Thrasymachus open to interpretations which he has not mean Socrates is immediately fit to counteract this argument by exemplify it in the real-life situation of the pancratiast (wrestler ) whose need for strength requires that he tucker out beef (338 d . Socrates extension of Thrasymachus argument shows that it would require that all men eat beef regardless of their n! eed for it entirely because a stronger man necessity for the commodity dictates this . Thrasymachus cannot admit this specific treatment of the social function to be true , and is whence forced to modify his direction .

He says , That s abominable of you , Socrates you abridge hold of the argument in the way you can persist it the most harm (338 e describing the method through which Socrates is able to confound his argument . In disproving an argument or whatsoever possible action , Socrates knows that one has save to find one special case in which the theory does not mount . He uses this knowledge to his advantage in succeeding against Thrasymachus , who should deem detected these areas of inconsistency on his own before presenting his argumentPlato later on presents a second area in which Socrates is successful in his argument against Thrasymachus . Thrasymachus argues a trifle more specifically when he speaks of the different types of government and how each rules by making and enforcing laws . He emphasizes the standardisedity of their methods while acknowledging a battle in the types of government that termination - yet without any evoke as to what might put on caused such differing outcomes from such similar methods . Socrates pounces upon this weakness by embarking on a dialectical tour toward discovering precisely what...If you want to piss a full essay, social club it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: wri te my paper