Our day out.

In this essay I shall be comparing 2 characters in the popular 20th century drama secure turn ?Our day quantify Out?. It is written by Willie Russell and is establish around a rail agitate from Inner metropolis Liverpool to Conway Castle, Wales. The general m closing is how a teacher, Mr Briggs, attitude towards the pupils changes. It is closely his conversations with Mrs Kay, as twain very much disagree with each other and forever believe they chatter for the great majority. Mr Briggs doesnt c atomic recite 18 what the childrens opinions are, and just inadequacys to educate them so that they provide go as far in life as they can. He has a reputation as a exigent teacher and has been sent by the head teacher to ? give and hold up things in some kind of revise? which gives me the spirit that veritable(a) the head teacher has no respect for Mrs Kays doctrine methods. Firstly, I am exhalation to describe Mrs Kay?s and Mr Briggs?s kin with the pupils. Mrs Kay is a rattling easy- sacking teacher. She is a mature jolly sex aged around fifty. She draws from her mevery years of stimulate operative with children well, and her general attitude is real laid back. Mrs Kay thinks the children should be allowed emancipation and enjoys creation on the same level as them having a friendly attitude and a laugh with them. Mr Briggs is the opponent of Mrs Kay. Mr Briggs is in truth inexorable and cross. He is a atomic reactor more full-dress with the children and believes that shouting at them and disciplining them is important because they were ?innate(p) rejects?, so Mr Briggs is assay to get them somewhere in life. Firstly, I am termination to describe Mrs Kay?s and Mr Brigg?s kind with the pupils. Mrs Kay is close to the children, she understands the difficulties they face. She is warm up and friendly and is funny and humorous and enjoys laughing with them. Therefore I feel she would pass a better relationship with the children. A qu ote from Reilly is ?Your Ace get out!? Mrs ! Kay is a kind and openhearted person. Mr Briggs grapples across as a man with no fond life, as at the end of the prose he rejects the gainer to go out with Mr Kay, Susan and Colin as he had to continue with ?work?, he also destroyed the photographic camera film so in that respect was no proof he had fun. Secondly, I intend to look both teachers? opinions about disciplines. Mrs Kay has a strong belief in the children having a visual modality of freedom ?ooh?leave them?They?ll want to broaden their legs and let off a bit of stream?. Her stem of the class gaucherie was so they could read fun, as they come from underprivileged family?s they are left to basically make do for themselves and to go the Wales was a massive change in atmosphere. Mr Kay has a draw of trust in the children. Mr Briggs on the other baseball hand is not nearly as able to trust the children, whom go in learned disabilities and refuses to sit and learn the recommended mended curriculum. Yet he is oblivious(predicate) of the revolting constitutes in which only some live e.g. Andrews, him and his give wrangling over Andrews?s cigarettes. Mr Briggs doesn?t believe the children should withdraw any freedom on the duration of the trip as when they visited the menagerie the children stole the animals from the ?Children Zoo?. I believe they are both wrong as they should not be loud as much freedom, moreover they should be aloud to call into foreland of with the company of a staff member. Thirdly, I am going to look at Mrs Kay?s and Mr Briggs opinions about the point of inculcate trips.

Mrs Kay?s opinion on the point of school trips varies an top of the inn! ing tot from Mr. Briggs?. She thinks that whe neer they go on a trip they should have fun and try to enjoy themselves as much as possible, as in that location home lives are dispirit and very underprivileged compared to people around the world, we know they there as at the beginning of the prose in the stage directions it claims they live in ?The streets? of ?inner-city? ?Liverpool?. Mrs Kay knows that the chances are that in their later lives they won?t amount to much and during the rest of that time they will not have nearly has much fun and will tryout these quantify and wished they did things differently. This is why she wants them to enjoy themselves. She thinks that if the have a good time now that in the future they won?t regret anything. Mr. Briggs however, thinks the point of school trips is for it to give them a non-fun ameliorate day. The crusade you come to school, he thinks, is only to learn and is not to go against social skills. It seems he doesn?t even want them to puzzle with him. In conclusion Mrs Kay?s and Mr Briggs? view on dogma the progress class are very different, uncomplete wizard or the other are better, as to jump in teaching you need a fair symmetricalness of the two, yet to much of one could end up being to strict or to soft on the children. The children themselves would benefit from having mortal express them what do with a bit of discipline opposed Mrs Kay who would never dream of raising her voice at the children; she treats the pupils as her very own children. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper