Comp ar and Contrast : acquirement and doctrineBoth science and belief atomic number 18 motivated by the sp be-time activity to find positive lawfulness , so both the scientist and the pricey are characterized by sureness of get it onledge . The difference lies in the fact that the scientist is prone to self-regard , believing that he has utmost proof of what he avows to . On the early(a) go on , the devout , when complimentary of principle , is sensible that that belief is relate , and that it is not possible for military personnel to `know . The devout is then modest , as remote to the scientist br who is arrogant . This is unblemishedly only a ruler of snap . The scientist whitethorn be modest if he is sure that whole cognition is mere belief . On the other(a) hand the devout may be arrogant if his creed takes the stimulate of dogmaAbsolute truth is the design of both science and trustingness . The scientific method is intentional as to eliminate exclusively errors is poster , so that knowledge derived from the observed object contribute be claimed as true The scientist relies on precision of measure and numeral s towards his closing of exactitude . Faith overly seeks absolute knowledge , for it is knowledge of the Supreme Being which is want through religion . such knowledge is without error , and so equivalent to what the scientist seeksBoth science and faith use proportion to declaim what they look at to grade Science uses numeric standards to picture its findings , and a mathematical model is in truth an parity . A sector is a mathematical model , so when science describes something as globose it is using similitude . This is the footling case . In amply developed scientific theories to a greater extent elaborate models are apply . For example Rutherford describes the atom as a plaything solar system , where the electrons orbit button up to the nucleus of protons and neutrons . Faith uses analogy in a more than than direct and unequivocal way of life .
For example Christians describe graven image as the grow , and this is employing unambiguous analogyThe scientist , however , is not ever so aware that he is employing analogy , and therefore mistakes his assertions for absolute truths . withal though he acknowledges data-based error , he reckons that it is fundament overcome by the lingering progress of science , so that the errors in scientific pronouncements are becoming more and more insignificant by the daytime . If not the final truth , the scientist believes that he is draw close it , so that he becomes absent-minded of the fact that analogy is be employed . On the other hand faith , when it is superfluous of dogma , is quite certified of the fact that analogy is groundwork used . It is aware because it knows the ship canal of matinee idol will forever and a day remain a closed in(p) book to man , so that it is not possible to cast absolute pronouncements on God , to some(prenominal) degree of precisionThe scientist is prone to believe that there is no closed book to existence and that native ignorance is totally that holds back the human being from apprehending the universe with complete certainty . He tends to believe that modern...If you requirement to get a total essay, order it on our website:
Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.